Here’s how and why my copywriting can make you more money CLICK HERE
See my copywriting website by CLICKING HERE
If you have never been to my blog before my name is Richard Woodling. I am, among other things, a writer. I am opinionated, there’s no question about that, and I don’t suffer fools. I mean what’s the point? I’ve been around long enough that I don’t feel that I have to do that anymore. Don’t get me wrong, I am not going to get on a soapbox and scream because you disagree with this post or with me. I won’t do that because you can believe whatever you want. I really don’t care. What I’m really trying to determine is if there are any evolution advocates who have any working brain cells left. What am I talking about? Well it’s like this…
I’m fed up with folks that are smug in the conviction that evolution is the way all life arose on the Earth and in our universe. But it doesn’t stop there. These same people generally think that if you disagree with them and don’t embrace Darwin you must be some sort of ignorant hick who is educationally challenged. This is why I’m writing this post. Because Darwin is wrong boys and girls.
If you are a Darwin advocate you probably studied and learned about his evolution theory at some university and this post is probably going to tick you off. At least I hope it does. Here’s a question for you. Are faulty propositions correct just because they’re taught in institutions of higher learning? I think not. Let me ask you another question. When you were taught Darwin’s evolution theory were you able to or did you even think about asking any probing questions about the process being taught? And if you did, did you get satisfactory answers or did you just accept it all as the truth? Regardless, if you are a Darwin advocate here’s why Darwin is wrong and why you’re wrong.
Among other reasons it just doesn’t make any sense. For one it violates the second law of thermodynamics. If you are not familiar with thermodynamics the second law states that over time all complex systems whether biological or mechanical will become more disorganized and decay not become more complex. In other words all systems over time devolve they do not not evolve. Evolution states just the opposite. Thermodynamics is a well tested law and a benchmark relied on by the sciences. For another reason evolution, as proposed by Darwin, is mathematically impossible. There has not been enough time to have enough positive mutations arise to evolve human beings from our alleged bipedal ancestors into the complex animals we are today. Current findings in anthropology back that proposition up. As long as the Earth has had life on it, and that’s billions of years according to science, that’s still not been long enough for enough positive mutations to effect the alleged evolution of Human beings. And that’s a fact Jack! So what have we got? Well first we have that evolution violates a primary physical law, the law of thermodynamics, and it violates another tenet fundamental to the theory, enough time. There has not been enough time for anything to evolve. So it’s a catch 22. Now for a little side track before I get to my questions.
There are several well known influential people that I have a hard time understanding how they can intellectually justify their opinions. This only bothers me because of their influence on lesser minds. They are in fact leading thousands of otherwise good people astray. One is Dr. Richard Dawkins, an evolutionary biologist, and the other is Seth MacFarlane a singer, voice over artist, and actor. Dr. Dawkins is smart and successful no doubt about it. But even when confronted with evidence that the origin of life cannot be explained by any random natural process he still refuses to look else where. And the elsewhere I’m talking about is a supernatural explanation. God if you will. It’s just puzzling to me. He’s supposed to be a scientist. He sure doesn’t act like one.
Our other candidate is Seth MacFarlane. He is also extremely bright and extremely talented. But all that aside, he’s an in your face atheist and advocate of Darwin evolution. Since he’s so bright you would think he would be aware of the fact that natural explanations for the origins question are fading away like a summer fog. In fact evidence is getting so slim that the Darwin advocates are now leaning on Pantheism as the go to theory. Pantheism is a theory that physics and chemistry work better in other parts of the universe than they do here. When life arose in this better part of the universe it was then seeded on Earth by an advanced alien race. Wait a minute. What! The truth is Pantheism is absolute nonsense. Physics and chemistry are uniform throughout our universe. I would like to point out that Pantheism has no scientific backing or evidence to support it. It’s what my dad called “Just a bunch of Jaw Boogey.”
This brings me to the only conclusion that makes any sense to me of why these supposed smart guys think this way. The concept of a creator you have to actually answer to just creeps some people out. They can’t, no, they won’t accept it.
Now for the good part. The questions I want you to answer.
Charles Darwin is quoted as saying:
“If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed, which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down“.
The DNA molecule fits this test. DNA, on the face of it, is a complex molecule that acts like a singular unique organ or organelle. DNA is so phenomenal in its construction and operation that Bill Gates is quoted as saying “DNA is like a computer program but far, far more advanced than any software ever created.”
How did any natural process produce this amazing structure? How did any natural process produce the miniature complex machines that make up the DNA molecule? These micro machines are in fact only a few atoms wide and would have absolutely no functionality at all unless all the parts were in effect simultaneously. Since this is true it means that DNA was not created by numerous successive slight modifications over vast amounts of time. But I know that you probably learned how it came to be in your class at university, right?
And your answer is…
If you are unaware of the true magnificence of the DNA molecule watch these animations done for the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. Just click on the links.
For the DNA molecule to function it must have information. Information is not matter. It is not a material substance. Information is mass-less. Since it is mass-less it is a fundamentally different substance from matter. Since it is a fundamentally different substance it cannot arise from matter nor can it be a product or by product of matter.
Yet the DNA molecule is encoded with over 3 billion bits of it; information that is essential for the manufacture of the proteins and other elements necessary to produce a human being. Where did the information come from?
And your answer is…
Good luck and have fun. Below are some quotes and dissenting opinions by scientists that are as bright as Dr. Dawkins and Seth about this whole question.
“The pathetic thing is that we have scientists who are trying to prove evolution, which no scientist can ever prove.”
(Dr Robert Millikan, Nobel Prize winner and eminent evolutionist)
“The likelihood of the formation of life from inanimate matter is one to a number with 40,000 noughts after it … It is big enough to bury Darwin and the whole theory of evolution … if the beginnings of life were not random, they must therefore have been the product of purposeful intelligence.”
(Sir Fred Hoyle, astronomer, cosmologist and mathematician, Cambridge University)
“Fossils are a great embarrassment to Evolutionary theory and offer strong support for the concept of Creation.”
(Gary Parker, Ph.D., biologist/ paleontologist and former evolutionist)
For those of you who might like to read my book on this subject titled “God The Universe and Darwin” you can read a bit of it and get a copy by going to this link http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00ADPP534
© Richard Woodling 2014